Vegan Group Threatens Primitive Skills Teacher Over “Humane Slaughter” Class


posted
Categories: Education

Being in the Permaculture movement, and trying to learn and apply sustainable theories in our every day life, trying to raise our animals in the best humane condition, for them to have the best life possible, growing our own food and learning always new skills that will allow us to have a better life, richer in experience and aware of where our food comes from, and how to live with less; it is hard to stumble upon articles that make your blood boil. This following article is one of those, where self-righteous humans, through intimidation and bullying make something ugly over something that could have been a wonderful and enriching experience, yes ending a life for food is hard, I have done it myself and there is nothing pleasant about it, but if we are making the choice to eat meat, we must know what it takes to do so, you will never take life for granted again, and a sense of respect for that animal will overwhelm you.

Rather than focus on horrors and atrocities on factory farms, a national animal rights group is targeting the female owner of a small primitive-skills school in the Appalachian mountains for an upcoming course on the humane slaughter and butchery of animals. 

The school – Wild Abundance – also offers courses in off-grid living, eco-homesteading, tiny-home building, women’s carpentry, foraging, organic gardening, permaculture and hide tanning. The founder of the school Natalie Bogwalker also organizes a popular annual event called the Firefly Gathering, a 4-day convention on sustainable living and rewilding. 

It’s hardly the kind of place you’d imagine would attract the ire of an animal rights group. To the contrary, Wild Abundance and Firefly are known locally for their deep respect for animals, plants and all living creatures. 

But the vegan group One Protest has created a national campaign against the school called the Let Live Coalition and has created a website specifically to try and prevent a two-day course scheduled to start on November 19th, in which two pasture-raised sleep will be slaughtered.
“The Let Live Coalition is committed to opposing the misinformation and myths of ‘humane’ meat generally, as well as the accompanying proliferation of DIY/backyard slaughter workshops, the group’s website says.

“OneProtest has partnered with the Let Live Coalition to protest a ‘sacred and humane’ slaughter workshop near Asheville, NC, where a live sheep will be ‘honored’ by having her throat slit.”

The group sent a letter to Wild Abundance asking them to cancel the class – saying it “normalizes meat consumption” and “perpetuates factory farming” – and threatening to stage protests if the class goes forward.

Wild Abundance founder Natalie Bogwalker claims One Protest members are harassing her with aggressive phone calls at all hours while she attempts to rest with her 3-week-old baby. One angry vegan activist from the UK even threatened to slit her partner’s throat.

In response, Wild Abundance started a petition  asking One Protest to stop harassing Bogwalker and Meredith Leigh, a formerly vegetarian female butcher, who has cancelled her visit to teach the class due to intimidation.

Below is an article from Time Magazine, that exemplifies what made us who we are today.

Science doesn't give a hoot about your politics. Think global warming is a hoax or that vaccines are dangerous? Doesn't matter, you're wrong.

Something similar is true of veganism. Vegans are absolutely right when they say that a plant-based diet can be healthy, varied and exceedingly satisfying, and that—not for nothing—it spares animals from the serial torments of being part of the human food chain. All good so far. 

But there's veganism and then there's Veganism—the upper case, ideological veganism, the kind that goes beyond diet and lifestyle wisdom to a sort of counterfactual crusade. For this crowd, it has become an article of faith that not only is meat-eating bad for humans, but that it's always been bad for humans—that we were never meant to eat animal products at all, and that our teeth, facial structure and digestive systems are proof of that.

You see it in Nine Reasons Your Canine Teeth Don't Make You a Meat-Eater; in PETA's Yes, It's True: Humans Aren't Meant to Eat Meat; in Shattering the Myth: Humans Are Natural Vegetarians. (Google "humans aren't supposed to eat meat" and have at it.)

But sorry, it just ain't so. As a new study in Nature makes clear, not only did processing and eating meat come naturally to humans, it's entirely possible that without an early diet that included generous amounts of animal protein, we wouldn't even have becomehuman—at least not the modern, verbal, intelligent humans we are.

It was about 2.6 million years ago that meat first became a significant part of the pre-human diet, and if Australopithecus had had a forehead to slap it would surely have done so. Being an herbivore was easy—fruits and vegetables don't run away, after all. But they're also not terribly calorie-dense. A better alternative were so-called underground storage organs (USOs)—root foods like beets and yams and potatoes. They pack a bigger nutritional wallop, but they're not terribly tasty—at least not raw—and they're very hard to chew. According to Harvard University evolutionary biologists Katherine Zink and Daniel Lieberman, the authors of the Nature paper, proto-humans eating enough root food to stay alive would have had to go through up to 15 million "chewing cycles" a year.

This is where meat stepped—and ran and scurried—in to save the day. Prey that has been killed and then prepared either by slicing, pounding or flaking provides a much more calorie-rich meal with much less chewing than root foods do, boosting nutrient levels overall. (Cooking, which would have made things easier still, did not come into vogue until 500,000 years ago.)

In order to determine how much effort primitive humans saved by eating a diet that included processed animal protein, Zink and Lieberman recruited 24 decidedly modern humans and fed them samples of three kinds of OSU's (jewel yams, carrots and beets) and one kind of meat (goat, raw, but screened to ensure the absence of any pathogens). Using electromyography sensors, they then measured how much energy the muscles of the head and jaw had to exert to chew and swallow the samples either whole or prepared one of the three ancient ways.

On average, they found that it required from 39% to 46% less force to chew and swallow processed meat than processed root foods. Slicing worked best for meat, not only making it especially easy to chew, but also reducing the size of the individual particles in any swallow, making them more digestible. For OSUs, pounding was best—a delightful fact that one day would lead to the mashed potato. Overall, Zink and Lieberman concluded, a diet that was one-third animal protein and two-thirds OSUs would have saved early humans about two million chews per year—a 13% reduction—meaning a commensurate saving in time and calorie-burning effort just to get dinner down.

That mattered for reasons that went beyond just giving our ancient ancestors a few extra free hours in their days. A brain is a very nutritionally demanding organ, and if you want to grow a big one, eating at least some meat will provide you far more calories with far less effort than a meatless menu will. What's more, while animal muscle eaten straight from the carcass requires a lot of ripping and tearing—which demands big, sharp teeth and a powerful bite—once we learned to process our meat, we could do away with some of that, developing smaller teeth and a less pronounced and muscular jaw. This, in turn, may have led to other changes in the skull and neck, favoring a larger brain, better thermo-regulation and more advanced speech organs.

"Whatever selection pressures favored these shifts," the researchers wrote, "they would not have been possible without increased meat consumption combined with food processing technology."

None of that, of course, means that increased meat consumption—or any meat consumption at all—is necessary for the proto-humans' 21st century descendants. The modern pleasures of a grilled steak or a BLT may well be trumped by the health and environmental benefits of going vegan—and if the animals got a vote, they'd surely agree. But saying no to meat today does not mean that your genes and your history don't continue to give it a loud and rousing yes.

via ReturnToNow

  Page Turn  


Related articles in Education